Studio Salon is a weekly gathering where artists in any discipline share works-in-process and practice structured, peer feedback. Sessions will take place every Saturday for seven weeks, beginning October 4th.

Organized by Kristen Yeung (www.kristenyeung.com) and Skye Hughes (skyehughes.wtf) — if you’re an old friend or someone we haven’t yet had the pleasure of meeting, welcome to this informational page!

If you’re reading this, you must be (at least) slightly interested! Nice. Read on to learn more.

Studio Salon in Brief

🦜 Who’s it for?

Anyone making art in any medium! We’re hoping to bring together folks from all corners of Seattle—writers, visual artists, performers, filmmakers, musicians… and anything else in the spaces between or outside. We are sort of anti-category, we just want to spark more connection and conversation across forms and communities. If you’re interested in making things and talking about them, you’re totally welcome, all backgrounds and experience levels.

Our Process

On Day 1, we’ll co-create our own “Studio Salon Protocol:”

🧰 Feedback Frameworks

Here are a couple of feedback frameworks that exemplify the spirit of what we’re aiming for. These are examples of methods we can draw inspiration from as we co-create our own approach to discussing work. Each offers thoughtful strategies for fostering constructive, artist-centered dialogue—the kind of environment we hope to cultivate at Studio Salon.

Method Core Idea Key Steps & Practices Why We Like It
Fieldwork (The Field, NYC) Ongoing peer feedback lab since 1986 that values artistic autonomy, rigor, and equity. 1. Artists show work without explanation.
  1. Group gathers in a circle.
  2. Sequential verbal feedback—focused on what viewers saw, felt, or questioned (no directing or “fix-its”).
  3. If time, open discussion. | • Feedback centered on the artist’s vision, not outside solutions. • Emphasis on creating a “safer + braver” space that honors diverse identities. | | Critical Response Process (CRP) — Liz Lerman | Facilitated dialogue that moves from reflection → questions → opinions, giving the artist maximum control. | 1. Statements of Meaning – responders share what was striking or meaningful.
  4. Artist as Questioner – artist asks the group about specific aspects; responders answer.
  5. Neutral Questions – responders ask non-leading questions; artist replies.
  6. Opinion Time – responders offer opinions only with the artist’s permission (optional “fix-its”). | • Lets the artist steer the conversation via their own questions. • Neutral questioning encourages curiosity over judgment. • Built-in consent (“May I share an opinion about…?”) models respect and agency. |